Product Comparison: Shure PGA27 vs Shure SM27
Advertiser Disclosure
X
This site is a free online resource that strives to offer helpful content and comparison features to its visitors. Please be advised that the operator of this site accepts advertising compensation from certain companies that appear on the site, and such compensation impacts the location and order in which the companies (and/or their products) are presented, and in some cases may also impact the scoring that is assigned to them. The scoring that appears on this site is determined by the site operator in its sole discretion, and should NOT be relied upon for accuracy purposes. In fact, Company/product listings on this page DO NOT imply endorsement by the site operator. Except as expressly set forth in our Terms of Use, all representations and warranties regarding the information presented on this page are disclaimed. The information which appears on this site is subject to change at any time. More info
General Specifications
Brand
Shure
Shure
Model
PGA27
SM27
Origin
Mexico
Mexico
About the Product
The PGA27 is a professional quality large diaphragm condenser microphone with an updated design featuring a black metallic finish and grille offering an unobtrusive visual presence. Legendary Shure quality construction ensures exceptional performance in rigorous environments.
The SM27 is a rugged and versatile large-diaphragm, side-address cardioid condenser microphone. It has low self-noise and extended frequency response that picks up vocal and instrument nuances with clarity.
Key Specs
Microphone Type
Condenser
Condenser
Polar Pattern
Cardioid
Cardioid
Minimum Frequency Response
20 Hz
20 Hz
Maximum Frequency Response
20 kHz
20 kHz
What customers say about "Key Specs"
Shure PGA27 Large Diaphragm Cardioid Condenser Microphone
- Great mic! The highs are bright and clean, and the lows are nice and deep.
- I love this mic. Its sound is superb.
- It's great for YouTube video recording.
- Incredible microphone. Definition of a clear and excellent sound by recording vocals.
- Very good microphone, excellent quality, great for voice recording.
Shure SM27 Condenser Microphone
- Very good mic for the money. Great for voiceover work or instruments.
- Very well built and solid shock mount.
- It gives pretty darn good sound with low noise.
- Audio recording is very clear.
- I love this mic, sound quality so good.
Size & Weight
Height
6.02 in.
6.14 in.
Width
2.2 in.
2.09 in.
Depth
2.2 in.
2.09 in.
Weight
1 lbs.
1.42 lbs.
Features
Maximum SPL
130 dB SPL
138 dB SPL
Output Impedance
115 Ω
140 Ω
Microphone Sensitivity
-35.0dB
-37.0dB
Interface
XLR
XLR
Power Options
+48V Phantom power required from mixer or inteface
+48V Phantom power required from mixer or inteface
Extras
High-pass filter, Switchable attenuation pad, Internal capsule shock mounting, Legendary Shure quality design
Large 1" capsule, Premium electronic components, Switchable 15 dB pad, Internal capsule shock mounting
Equivalent Noise Level
9.5 dBA
What customers say about "Features"
Shure PGA27 Large Diaphragm Cardioid Condenser Microphone
- Good clarity and well constructed.
- It is durable and sturdy!
- This microphone sounds amazing, better than any microphone I've ever owned.
- Nice and reliable product, sound quality is very good.
- The sound quality is very clear.
Shure SM27 Condenser Microphone
- My voice is smooth and not crunchy.
- The quality of the recordings are excellent.
- Excellent quality microphone.
- Good sound quality and easy to work with.
- Very realistic and accurate sounding.
Warranty / Certifications
Manufacturer Warranty
1 year(s)
1 year(s)
Certifications
EEC, CE
EEC, CE
Other Information
Popular Comparisons
Pyle PDMIC58 Dynamic Microphone
vs
Pyle PDMIC78 Dynamic Microphone
Fifine K6 Dynamic Microphone
vs
Fifine K8 Dynamic Microphone
Shure SV100 Dynamic Microphone
vs
Shure SV200 Dynamic Microphone
Shure PGA48 Cardioid Dynamic Vocal Microphone
vs
Shure SM48 Cardioid Dynamic Vocal Microphone
Behringer Ultravoice XM8500 Dynamic Cardioid Vocal Microphone
vs
Behringer XM1800S Dynamic Microphone
Boya BY-M1 Lavalier Microphone
vs
Boya BY-M1 Pro Omnidirectional Lavalier Microphone
Sony ECM-77B Condenser Lavalier Microphone
vs
Sennheiser ME 2-II Lavalier Microphone
Rode Lavalier GO Lavalier Microphone
vs
Rode Smartlav+ Lavalier Microphone
Behringer SL 85S Dynamic Cardioid Microphone
vs
Behringer Ultravoice XM8500 Dynamic Cardioid Vocal Microphone
Audix OM6 Dynamic Microphone
vs
Audix OM7 Dynamic Microphone
Audix OM5 Dynamic Microphone
vs
Audix OM7 Dynamic Microphone
Audix OM2 Dynamic Microphone
vs
Audix OM3 Dynamic Microphone
Audix D6 Dynamic Microphone
vs
AKG D112 MKII Dynamic Microphone
Neewer NW-700 Professional Studio Broadcasting Recording Condenser Microphone
vs
Neewer NW-800 Professional Studio Broadcasting Recording Condenser Microphone
SE Electronics V7 Dynamic Microphone
vs
SE Electronics V7 X Dynamic Microphone