Product Comparison: Tamron 100-400 mm F/4.5-6.3 Di VC USD vs Sigma 100-400 mm F5-6.3 DG OS HSM
This site is a free online resource that strives to offer helpful content and comparison features to its visitors. Please be advised that the operator of this site accepts advertising compensation from certain companies that appear on the site, and such compensation impacts the location and order in which the companies (and/or their products) are presented, and in some cases may also impact the scoring that is assigned to them. The scoring that appears on this site is determined by the site operator in its sole discretion, and should NOT be relied upon for accuracy purposes. In fact, Company/product listings on this page DO NOT imply endorsement by the site operator. Except as expressly set forth in our Terms of Use, all representations and warranties regarding the information presented on this page are disclaimed. The information which appears on this site is subject to change at any time. More info
- I've used many lenses of similar size and focal length, and for me at least this one hits the target perfectly.
- Such a focal length is new to me, and there is a learning curve, particularly travelling fast and light hand-held.
- This is a fun lens to use, and performs better than expected given its price range. Great focal length.
- I can quite happily use half the focal length for shutter speed. Focusing at such extreme focal lengths is new challenge
- Shitty focal length that works worse than my old lens.
- The Nikon does beat the Sigma when it comes to image stabilisation and the maximum aperture at 400mm is f/5.6 on the Nikon and f/6.3 on the Sigma.
- Great size and build, sharp across all focal lengths and with fast AF.
- This is a short initial review for a potential buyer. This lens is sharp (for my purposes) at all focal lengths, especially at 400mm.
- It should go without saying that any lens with a maximum aperture of f/5.6 or slower isn't going to be a stellar performer in low light, so that needs to be taken into consideration.
- Slow lens: max aperture decreases quickly. It's f/5.3 at 125mm, f/5.6 at 155mm, f/6 at 220, & f/6.3 at 350.
- I wanted a lens that wasn't too heavy, this one is lighter than the Canon 400mm F5.6L.
- Purchased due to weight difference between tamron and Nikon being far lighter and easier to carry.
- I purchased the lens a few months ago, i use for aircraft photography, it is sharp, superb quality, light weight and very well made.
- Too big to fit in my bag. I’m upset that I have to carry it in my hands.
- Large and heavy, which causes discomfort during long photo shoots.
- The lens is not heavy for it's size, but even so I do miss not having a tripod mount which is the only negative point I would raise.
- Amazingly compact and light compared to other long zooms.
- In sum, this lens comes close, but not as close as I would like. It is close in performance to the more expensive lenses, and the compact size is a huge plus.
- If you do not use a tripod, then you will have problems with its weight.
- It is too heavy for continuous photography. Hands are incredibly tired.
- It has a closer focusing ability that will be very handy me in spring and summer.
- This is a keeper and one of the constant user lenses for so many days ot, two bodies with a wide angle zoom and this, sorted.
- Manual zooming and focusing are low-geared and smooth. Control rings are wide and ribbed for good grip.
- When I've hit focus, image quality has been exceptional - even to see crystal-clear background reflections in a gull's eye at 10m. That's what I mean by fun to use.
- Focus was quick and overall I was pleased with the images I got. I did plan to sell it when I returned home but decided to keep it and have used it numerous times since.
- The lens is also beautifully designed, and I am really appreciating the push-pull mechanism to adjust the focal length. It gives me less arm fatigue than having to turn the focal length ring.
- If you want a sharp, fast focussing telephoto zoom and don't want to break the bank, the Sigma is a genuinely great choice.
- Solidly built with very smooth zoom and manual focus. Excellent price for such a long zoom.
- I just didn't like the zoom ring's inconsistent zoom spacing nb 300-400mm was much shorter travel than 100-200 and 200-300.
- I was unable to get this Sigma lens to focus sharply on either Autofocus nor on Manual. Autofocus was hopeless.
- The AF is fast and accurate, plus the VC, (their version of Canon's IS) is superb!
- Be careful with getting this lens if you use one of the canon new mirrorless cameras. Tamron state compatibility from firmware version 1.3 which is from Feb 2019.
- Super sharp with very good vc it can be fine tuned with the tap in console.
- The front surface of the lens element is coated with a protective fluorine compound that is water- and oil-repellant.
- If you happen to get a lens with older firmware, you will need the very expensive Tamron Tap in console, to update the firmware.
- After customizing the OS and AF of this lens with the USB dock, things seem to be working a lot better.
- I recommend purchasing this lens with the Sigma USB dock. While the in body Optical Stabilization (OS) on this lens is great.
- Both the rotating zoom and focus rings feel very smooth while offering the right amount of resistance so that nothing feels too loose.
- A push/pull zooming function and a new Hyper Sonic Motor (HSM) allow for a more responsive approach to photography.
- Had a few OS issues in certain conditions which led me to pay for the USB dock.